I wrote: > Or to put it another way: if currently > libfoo1 (1.1) contains and needs /usr/share/libfoo1/foo-data-1.1 > libfoo1 (1.2) contains and needs /usr/share/libfoo2/foo-data-1.2 > then splitting the foo-data out into > libfoo1-data (1.1) <-depends- libfoo1 (1.1) > libfoo1-data (1.2) <-depends- libfoo1 (1.2) > means that when the libfoo packages are upgraded, there will be a > substantial period when we have /usr/lib/libfoo1.so.1.2 installed and > the symlink libfoo1.so.1 points to it, but > /usr/share/libfoo2/foo-data-1.2 is missing.
... or vice versa, of course. How long this situation persists will vary. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20281.91.957041.390...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
