Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: > David Kalnischkies <[email protected]> writes:
>> Maybe it would help this kind of discussions if we would have a list of >> interface changes in dpkg and how someone is supposed to use it in the >> future in case this has changed - i personally lost track of that. (In >> case someone wants to know this for APT: foo is interpreted as >> foo:native. If arch of foo is not native, the packagename is display >> as foo:arch. So at least in my eyes brain-death simple - and backward >> compatible. [and no, foo:* is currently not supported, but its on the >> todo]) > Yes, one drawback of my approach is that you use that very simple rule. Ack, sorry, that was supposed to be "that you *lose* that very simple rule." -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
