* Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) [120226 00:29]:
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Uoti Urpala <uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi> (26/02/2012):
> > > Is there reason to believe this would be a particular problem with
> > > systemd? Most of the controversy I've seen surrounding Poettering has
> > > been due to people resisting the kind of change he has championed. I
> > > don't remember seeing much about him being "difficult to work with" in
> > > any sense that would make it hard to contribute to systemd (though not
> > > much to the contrary either).
> > 
> > Working with Lennart seems as easy as having a discussion with you.
> 
> I take it this was only a pathologically weak attempt at flaming, and
> does not reflect any actual experience working with him?

You are of course free to provide a systemd version that is accepted
by upstream and works on all of our release architectures. Unless that,
I consider systemd a demo version not suiteable for production, and
nothing else.


Andi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120226091920.gg2...@mails.so.argh.org

Reply via email to