On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:44 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Svante Signell
> > Regarding who is expert or not, can the people who considers themselves > > as such (others shouldn't bother) do a _scientific_ comparison of the > > three alternatives with respect to important features. First step would > > be to write down which aspects are important, and continue from there. > > Also, practical experiments are needed to verify statements made. > > I'd rather work on making systemd better and a better init system for > Debian than to satisfy some academic desire for a comparison of init > systems. How on earth would anybody be able to make a decision if there are no comparisons between the alternatives available? Throw a dice, rely on gut feelings, or what? Since everybody is so damned biased in opinions, I don't see any alternative to making a thorough investigation. This could be a useful GSoC task. If case the "experts" approve that somebody not senior or expert enough enough do the work. This would be much more intersting than writing a systemd-to-initscript converter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1332341808.2962.264.ca...@s1499.it.kth.se
