On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:16:53PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Thibaut Paumard <paum...@users.sourceforge.net> > > * Package name : svipc > * URL : https://github.com/frigaut/yorick-svipc/
Given the rather generic package name, and the fact that upstream is already using yorick-svipc, wouldn't it be better to continue using yorick-svipc as the package name? > The 3 packages expose SysV IPC functionalities to the corresponding > interpreter: > > - shared memory; > - semaphores; > - message queues. Are the POSIX equivalents not supported already in Yorick and Python? While yorick-svipc is undoubtedly useful, it's also quite dated; the standard POSIX equivalents to the old SysV should really be preferred. FWIW, http://pypi.python.org/pypi/posix_ipc/0.8.1 Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120414203044.gf...@codelibre.net