On 04/27/2012 03:28 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 08:55 +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> On 04/27/12 03:32, Adam Borowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:08:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:03:17PM -0400, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>>> I believe Debian still supports running locally compiled kernels
>>>>> which do not depend on udev, and that some setups do not require
>>>>> udev either (not everyone use fibre channel).
>>>> 
>>>> It is supported only in the sense that it is not yet impossible.
>>>> 
>>>> Please don't ask anyone to spend time to avoid udev dependencies; 
>>>> hotplugging is normal and udev is the proper way to handle all 
>>>> devices the Linux kernel finds.
>> 
>> udev is just the reference implementation. mdev [part of busybox] can do 
>> the same (modulo rules: it has a slightly simpler format that doesn't 
>> provide exactly the same features (yet))
> [...]
> 
> Sure, for Linux in general you have other options like mdev.  However, 
> Debian uses udev.


Debian installs udev by default, but as with other init systems it should not
stop your from using whatever-you-like instead of udev.


-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f9d3b4f.8040...@bzed.de

Reply via email to