On Jue 03 May 2012 08:23:29 Stefano Zacchiroli escribió: [snip] > 3) public, but contributors-only list > > This has been implemented by other FOSS projects. A notable example is > Ubuntu who have a split between ubuntu-devel (project members only + > whitelisting) and ubuntu-devel-discuss (free for all). I've never asked, > but I have always suspected that they've done so in an attempt to > improve over the experience of debian-devel participants.
If you happen to ask, it would also be nice to know how it worked for them. > The obvious drawback of this "solution" is that non-contributors will > need someone to vouch for them to be whitelisted. Well, I think if someone contributes something in the -discuss list with good arguments/attitude/etc it will be much easier for him/her to get someone whitelist her/him than to get a sponsor for a package ;-) Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
