Le Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:38:49PM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit : > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:10:28AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:17:17PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > > > No, I hereby start saying good by to 3.0 > > > > I'm hoping we can revisit 3.0 (git) post-squeeze, myself. But I have also > > found myself to be incompatible iwth 3.0 (quilt) and used 1.0 for my last > > few packages. > > I can't see any reason to use 1.0 anymore, ever. > > It is true that 3.0 (quilt) does have a great downside, quilt, but it also > has a number of upsides. And working around quilt is simple: > > echo "single-debian-patch" >debian/source/options > echo "/.pc" >>.gitignore > echo "/debian/patches" >>.gitignore
It strikes me that while we have more than 6,500 source packages managed with Git, we are pushing for a source package format that does not work transparently with them. Also, it is very sad that, as a project, we can not decide whether we go for 3.0 (git) or not, or have a concrete list of resolvable objections from the people whose work is direclty impacted by the use of this format. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120516230943.gd17...@falafel.plessy.net