On 2012-07-14 22:59:35 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Due to those drawbacks, I've wondered why people don't just disable > NetworkManager on their system instead of bothering with workarounds > like the above or dpkg -P --force-depends and similar.
Sorry for being late in the discussion. I also think that having NetworkManager disabled for those who do not want to use it is a good solution. But I think that if other network configuration packages (ifupdown, wicd) are already used when network-manager is being installed, NetworkManager should be disabled by default, or the choice should be given to the user after telling him what is currently used. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120718121812.ga15...@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr
