On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:09 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote: > > Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We [...] > (*1) and if someone _really_ wants a debug build of that particular > problematic package, on a build and distro port that's still > experimental, well, surely they can compile it themselves, using their > own resources, yes?
Neither wheezy nor the armhf port contained in it are experimental. If that's not what you meant, please be clearer. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
