>>>>> Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> What I don't understand is why compilers (which probably means ld
>> from binutils in all cases) won't use ld.so.conf to find the libs.
>> It only does so to find libs linked into libs you link against. So
>> it is used execpt for the verry first level of recursion.
> The ld library path and compiler library path represent different
> things[*].
Somehow, I guess that “the ld.so(8) library path” and “the ld(1)
library path” were actually meant here.
[…]
--
FSF associate member #7257 http://sf-day.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86pq7my9i5....@gray.siamics.net
