On 2012-08-24 15:03:49 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 10:44 +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:51:27 +0100 > > Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > > > > What I mean is that this still happens: > > > > > # ifup eth0 > > > ... > > > # ifconfig eth0 down > > > # ifup eth0 > > > ifup: interface eth0 already configured > > > > Why should it happen otherwise? You did *NOT* deconfigure the interface. > > It certainly isn't in the state that 'ifup' put it the first time. I > want it back in that state now, why won't it do that?
Anyway even if one just uses ifup/ifdown (not ifconfig), one can get an inconsistent state (and not fixable by ifupdown). http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685500 -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120826194555.gb19...@xvii.vinc17.org
