Gergely Nagy <alger...@balabit.hu> wrote:
>Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > >> Whether a package is in need of greater attention is not a hard and >> fast objective thing. It's to a large part subjective. Perhaps the >> maintainer thinks it's more or less fine, or at least low enough >> priority that the problems are tolerable. > >Then the maintainer has many options, including but not limited to >NACK-ing the ITO. One has a lot of possibilities even before it comes >to >filing an ITO. AIUI, with the current proposal, as long as three DDs think it should be orphaned, the maintainer's objection is irrelevant. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/73a36e57-0c39-4688-bf88-bc7183ba7...@email.android.com
