On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > You critized their packaging, but this appears to be an upstream fork > which is not just a sed regexp to replace the name.
I am just sharing my experiences so far. I tried to help them to fix issues in mdm and my commits were reverted, even though other people agreed with me. I am just worried with the quality of packages in Debian. I choose Debian over everything else because of its high quality standards. > If people think it is worth keeping the nautilus codebase around, I > think it would be ok to have it packaged, Hmm, are the GNOME developers eventually dropping nautilus altogether? > there is worse bloat in Debian Sure, but that doesn't mean we should introduce more mess. We should rather clean up what's messed up. > and the default file manager of a very prominent desktop environment > can be a personal thing to users. I don't know, shouldn't these users just not use Linux Mint itself then? The version in Debian will be quickly outdated then anyway, so that most users will probably complain. Adrian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121109164756.ga29...@physik.fu-berlin.de
