On Sun 16 Dec 2012 02:58:36 Petter Reinholdtsen escribió: > [Ian Jackson] > > >There is still nothing per se wrong with circular dependencies > > [Thorsten Glaser] > > > Actually, I’m hitting an APT bug during dist-upgrades right now for > > packages with circular dependencies, usually two (perl with > > perl-modules, and g++-$version with its library), when they are > > indirectly depended on by a package with Important: yes set, as was > > recommended for metapackages which should not be considered by APT > > for automatic removal. > > A similar issue with libqt4-dbus is blocking upgrades of a desktop > installation from squeeze to wheezy the last two weeks (as detected by > jenkins.debian.net). See <URL: http://bugs.debian.org/655382 > and > related BTS reports for the details. > > I really hope we can get rid of the circular package dependencies. :)
I've has just wrote that in the bug report, but I think without CCing here. In the case of libqt4-dbus, the fix is ready to be uploaded and ACKed by the RT, but we are waiting for a fix of a FTBFS of the previous upload. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
