On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 10.02.2013 23:31, schrieb Philipp Kern: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:01:21PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> But it is ok to insist on using the exact binary version for > >> build-depending on source packages when it's not needed? This only seems > >> to be driven by the current dak implementation. > > That doesn't make sense to me. Where did somebody require this? > https://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2013/01/msg00012.html > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00711.html > maybe it's a coincidence, however creduce was formerly rejected for not having > a Built-Using attribute, and gcj-4.8, gnat-4.7 and gnat-4.8 are still in NEW.
Both links talk of Built-Using not Build-Depends. See above for what you wrote. ;-) Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
