Vincent, am Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:07:27PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > I don't think that the status even of a big package like iceweasel > is satisfactory.
I pretty much agree. But what's the problem here? That xulrunner and iceweasel have rdeps in the archive that aren't necessarily compatible with a new version of iceweasel and hence introducing yet another transition whenever the targeted release changes. > And concerning transitions, you don't need a freeze to block them. As if it would be that easy. c.f. R, which this thread is about and which didn't change any package name. Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
