On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 09:33:14PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 04:53:59PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > I think there's a consensus, the problem is who's going > > to do the work for automating dropping of binaries and > > rebuild. > > Not implying that I am the one doing this work, I would like to learn > more about what needs to be touched to achieve aspects of the following > features: (Again not implying that they are all desired.) > * Throwing away binaries and rebuilding everything. > * Permitting source-only uploads. > * arch:all binNMUs. > > Pointers to relevant documentation appreciated. Specific questions: > * Which tools/infrastructure needs changes? > * What are the general changes needed? > * How can those changes be split in independent pieces and applied > without interfering badly? > > Helmut
Maybe as an intermediate and imediate step we could switch to uploading only arch:all debs for mixed packages. That is already supported by DAK and the buildds and would drop a lot of locally build debs. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130506145729.GB21910@frosties