On May 10, Marc Haber <mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de> wrote: > Additional work necessary to satisfy upstream's bizarre ideas. Why not > keeping things the way they are now? They work. No need to waste > developer time. Why make new releases? bo worked fine, there is no need for new features.
> >People use live CDs for rescue all the time, do you have some data which > >show that this is actually a problem in real life and not an imaginary > >problem? > For example, a few years ago, I found myself in a (hoster provided) > rescue image with LVM 2 disabled in the kernel and needed to bootstrap > myself by installing grml[1] in a hastily made file system in the > former swap partition to access my disk. So this confirms that a live system like GRML is a good replacement for a rescue system, looks like we solved another use case. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
