Hi, I haven't been able to find anything on that in policy, so I have a question...
Since the state of Debian experimental is well "experimental", should we care about upgrade paths from experimental to unstable? I am inclined to say "no", but I would like to hear opinion of other developers. Specific example: There was a time when experimental had 'libgd2-3' and it was renamed to libgd3 (after consulting this with d-d and d-r). I haven't done the usual Conflicts/Replace to not clutter the control file, since I have assumed that people using experimental should be able to resolve this themselves. This is very simple example, but there might be other more complicated scenarios, where caring about the upgrade path might not be desireable. So what are your opinions? Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALjhHG8L8N7h2cxVuDGmcnt_HJmctW1=hap+4f556aagmud...@mail.gmail.com