Hello, On 02/06/13 18:54, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Jérome, > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Jerome BENOIT <g62993...@rezozer.net> wrote: > [...] >> In short, the initial question may be rephrase: >> what there is no `catalog' policy for docbook-xsl on Debian ? > > I believe there is a slight misunderstanding. /etc/xml/catalog is > properly setup on your debian system.
I have no doubt about it. I guess that what I do not get is the meaning of docbook-xsl versionning for the metadata However it is only used when > validating docbook 4.x or 5.x instances. > > There should not be any difference in between using docbook-xsl 1.75 > or docbook-xsl 1.76. Those are XSLT filters, they are only used during > the transformation of your docbook XML file into a different > representation (manpage, HTML, PDF ...). or imported inside other xsl filters. > > If you believe you found an issue with docbook >> 1.75.2, I guess it fine. please > report it using our BTS. docbook-xsl is pretty good at preserving > backward compatibility. > I think I am getting a better idea of my issue: the upstream furnished xsl files (XSLT filters ?) certainly depends via `import' on the xsl files of docbook-xsl 1.72.2 material while they should not: in short, they are (very) badly written in the sense that they do not follows the basic docbook rules. I guess I was misled by them. Very sorry for the noise, Jerome > thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51ab9691.70...@rezozer.net