On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Re cdn: > > IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit > painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC.
And it uses the location of the DNS resolver of the user, which we should get rid of. Having the client IP, like http.d.n does, can yield more informed decisions unless people invest time to implement support for the client subnet EDNS0 extension and possibly applying for the needed whitelistings. Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
