On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Michael Meskes <mes...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:52:33PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > I don't really understand it myself as server packages and their > > dependencies tend to be stable and I tend to want the latest versions of > > dovecot, unbound etc.. > > > > However perhaps there is a divide here between servers which want longer > > support for few packages and desktops which want stable but secure yet > > as featureful as is sensible desktops. > > I think you have a very valid point here. I kind of doubt many people would > like to run on a five year old desktop. > > Anyhow, I doubt we can reasonably expect to maintain *all* packages for a > longer > period. How about starting with a defined list of packages that we do care > about in an LTS? I would start with just the basic system and the most > important server packages. > Well, and how about starting to look at RFH for packages you care about right now and help with security (and SPU) updates right now, even without LTS? O. -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Have you tried Knot DNS – https://www.knot-dns.cz/ – a high-performance authoritative-only DNS server
