* Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net) wrote: > On 2013-09-30 20:38, Eric Dorland wrote: > > * Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) wrote: > >> Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> writes: > >>> Julian Taylor <jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> (2013-09-30): > >> > >>>> At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each > >>>> new upload: > >>>> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.*-Werror > >> > >>>> The list is small enough that it can be done by hand / small script. > >> > >>> So that they stop using Werror? Good idea. > >> > >> I use -Werror for Automake for all of the packages for which I'm upstream > >> and have not noticed it being a serious issue, although maybe I'm missing > >> something? But I didn't have any trouble regenerating the files for my > >> various packages with Automake 1.14. > > > > The one that's been biting people is there's a new warning for > > configure.in being deprecated. So for a well maintained package or a > > good upstream this isn't going to be a problem. > > > >> [...] > > > > For the record, Lintian should have a check for this[1]. From what we > can detect (assuming no false-positives), we got about 1.2k packages > using configure.in with automake (I guess most of them are not using > -Werror). Anyhow, </shameless-ad>
Well presumably most of them don't autoreconf either. Thanks for adding that check! > [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/deprecated-configure-filename.html > > > -- Eric Dorland <e...@kuroneko.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
