Hello, On 02/10/13 16:05, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > >> What does 'XXXXXX' stand for ? > > The short commit hash, as proposed in your initial mail.
In my first email, what you read as a commit hash was meant to be the date. To summarise: 0~YYYYMMDD should be fine. Thanks, Jerome > >> You should use a version derived from the date only. This way, you >> won't be in >> trouble if upstream switches to git. > > I absolutely do not see why this should be an issue. Using just a date is not > uniquely idemtifiable. > > -nik > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524c2bc3.3010...@rezozer.net
