On 24 October 2013 11:09, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > * it breaks other users of cgroups. I have not tested this personally > (mostly because of the above point), but if I understand it right, it takes > over the whole cgroups system, requiring anything that runs on the same > kernel instance to beg it via dbus to perform required actions. >
I have heard this said before, would like to have some official confirmation if this is actually the case or not. cgroups are currently hierarchical, I would have thought this would mean, at least in theory, different programs could be responsible for different parts of the hierarchy. If it is true, it is the thing we need to be prepared for, and so far I haven't seen any official information. This might also be relevant here: http://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/733595-all-about-the-linux-kernel-cgroups-redesign -- Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au>
