Another round of nitpicking: On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 10:01:46AM +0100, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:41:56AM -0600, Michael Shuler wrote: > > On 02/07/2014 10:25 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > >Is there a policy on how to package software that does not make releases? > > > > A version similar to skia_0.0-1~svnr1234 would allow an upstream
Isn't it: 0.0~svn1234-1 ? It is part of the upstream version, not of your packaging. > > version of i.e. 0.1 (if they ever release) to supersede your > > packaged version. It should also allow you to upgrade via new svn > > version (0.0-1~svnr1235), as well as new packaging of same svn > > version (0.0-2~svnr1234). Please, correct me, if there is a better > > method, here! > > One other thing to keep in mind: what if they switch to git? Answering myself: here's a simpler trick: Subversion revisions: 0~svn<revision> Switching to git: 0.0~git<date> Ugly, but not as ugly as switching an epoch, and you don't have to pay the price in advance as with '~~' or using dates for everything. And will be properly fixed when they finally issue a version. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [email protected] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [email protected] | | best [email protected] | | friend -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
