assuming for a second that you are not trolling, On 2014-02-28 12:56, Solal Rastier wrote: > Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... >
hmm. but since both "contrib" and "non-free" are not part of Debian, how does the existence of these sections lead to the conclusion that Debian is proprietary. another random example: the existence of "ubuntu" does not mean, that Debian is (say) "owned by canonical". fgsdfm IOhannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53147ca0.1070...@umlaeute.mur.at