On 06/03/2014 08:36 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Please don't get me wrong, but I am still not sure if this tremendous
> effort would not have been better invested in "GNOME Classic" or "GNOME
> flashback" instead of creating (and packaging) another fork.

I don't agree.

There's many things that I missed from GNOME 2, and that I'm *very*
happy to see back to running and maintained. Like: it's FAST. No way you
could get near to that speed with the classic mode of GNOME 3.

oh and ... no systemd, so it can run on non-linux ports! :)

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/538eb37d.20...@debian.org

Reply via email to