On 06/03/2014 08:36 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Please don't get me wrong, but I am still not sure if this tremendous > effort would not have been better invested in "GNOME Classic" or "GNOME > flashback" instead of creating (and packaging) another fork.
I don't agree. There's many things that I missed from GNOME 2, and that I'm *very* happy to see back to running and maintained. Like: it's FAST. No way you could get near to that speed with the classic mode of GNOME 3. oh and ... no systemd, so it can run on non-linux ports! :) Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/538eb37d.20...@debian.org