Wookey wrote: >+++ Matthias Urlichs [2014-06-26 11:58 +0200]: >> Hi, >> >> Andrew Shadura: >> > [14]http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=systemd-sysv+sysvinit&show_installed=on&want_legend=o >n&want_ticks=on&from_date=2014-01-01&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%Y-%m&beenhere=1 >> > >> Sorry, but this only demonstrates that you don't know what you're talking >> about. >> >> For a comparison that's even remotely meaningful you want sysvinit-core, >> not sysvinit. > >[15]http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=systemd-sysv+sysvinit-core&show_installed=on&want_legend= >on&want_ti%20+cks=on&from_date=2014-01-01&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%Y-%m&beenhere=1 > >Which shows about a change from 'peak sysvinit-core' in mid-april: > > Mid april Now >sysvinit-core: 89% 81% >systemd-sysv: 6% 19% > >Which seems plausible.
Except that sysvinit-core was not in stable and older, so youâd want to add those numbers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/loh6u9$ede$1...@ger.gmane.org
