On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers <[email protected]> wrote: > As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd > virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the > apache2-bin package, because the apache2-bin package doesn't provide a > working webserver. Bug report I just filed about this: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756361
[...] > A policy bug about what httpd-wsgi should provide is still open however: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588497 > > It isn't very easy to specify what httpd-wsgi should mean, because > some WSGI servers are full webservers with WSGI support such as apache > and others like gunicorn are only supposed to run behind a proxying > server such as apache or nginx (similar to for example php-fpm). > Thanks for the BTS references. Looks like I should keep using "libapache2-mod-wsgi, apache2" for now, but be prepared to change this depending on what happens with #756361. So as far as I can see, the correct dependency should be: > > Depends: libapache2-mod-wsgi | httpd-wsgi, apache2 | httpd > > So it also possible to run other webservers. > Yes, that looks good to me. Suspect the actual line may depend on what happens with #588497. -- Brian May <[email protected]>
