On Sunday 10 August 2014 15:52:51 Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 10.08.2014 um 15:25 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer: > > Interesting, because yesterday I've got a patch [0] (cool, thanks a lot!) > > but stating that the package has been NMUed and uploaded to delayed/5. > > So, even 5 less days than in your case. > > > > Less than 5 minutes later, the package entered the archive [1]. > > > > So, what am I supposed to do here? > > > > Doko: I *really* appreciate the fact that you sent a patch, but *please* > > respect your fellow DDs. > > The first thing you can do is to stop assuming bad faith, instead of > assuming a mistake. I wouldn't have sent an email to the bug report and > then uploading the package by intent. So sorry about the unplanned > immediate upload. > > I wasn't aware that we are still supposed to do delayed/10 uploads, now that > the default priority for uploads is medium. > > The issue was filed on May 4, with severity important and tagged for jessie. > No reaction. The severity was raised on May 30 to serious. No reaction. > Instead some severity ping-pong was played on other issues. No reaction on > a RC issue for over two months?
I stand corrected. My public apologies for this, specially to you Matthias. Maybe I need some VACs :) -- Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be very selective about who it decides to make friends with. Unknown - http://www.linfo.org/q_unix.html Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
