Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> The alternative is handwaving and ignoring the fact that your package >> repository is not a complete representation of your package as it >> exists in the archive. > What's wrong with storing the upstream tarballs themselves on a separate > branch, if you're that desperate to have them inside the same git repo > as the code? I like Git repositories that are about 10MB rather than 200MB or more. (And yes, I have used exactly that approach in the past, and know exactly how painful having all the tarballs in the revision control system is. Never again.) -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
