Ralf Jung <[email protected]> writes: > couldn't logcheck get much more clever on a systemd-enabled system? > After all, the priorities are preserved, so everything of priority > "info" or lower could be ignored automatically - and only warnings and > errors considered further. Actually that's one of the reasons why I am > looking forward to running systemd on my servers.
I think that would be good functionality for logcheck to have, but I personally wouldn't turn it on. I really like the more comprehensive log filtering and like seeing every log message that I don't know for certain I don't care about. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
