Hi Henrique, On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:18:02PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > OTOH, using -z9 on datasets smaller than the -z8 dictionary size *is* a > waste of memory (I don't know about cpu time, and xz(1) doesn't say anything > on that matter). The same goes for -z8 and datasets smaller than -z7 > dictionary size, and so on. > It is rather annoying that xz is not smart enough to detect this and > downgrade the -z level when it is given a seekable file (which it can stat() > and know the full size of beforehand).
This wouldn't seem too hard to implement in xz - have you asked upstream about it? Riku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140925095914.ga4...@afflict.kos.to