> On 27 Sep 2014, at 10:36, Adam Borowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Except that the endianness war has been won by little-endian And yet, network byte order remains big. It's less important which endian they pick, but that they pick one and use it consistently across arches. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
- binary data file and endianness and multiarch Jerome BENOIT
- Re: binary data file and endianness and multiarch Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: binary data file and endianness and multia... Adam Borowski
- Re: binary data file and endianness and mu... Jonathan Dowland
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Matthias Urlichs
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: binary data file and endianness and mu... Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Jerome BENOIT
- Re: binary data file and endianne... Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: binary data file and endianness and mu... Thomas Goirand
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Johannes Schauer
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Adam D. Barratt
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Guillem Jover
