On 29/11/14 13:30, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 29 novembre 2014 12:41 GMT, Alastair McKinstry > <alastair.mckins...@sceal.ie> : >> One concern I'd have is the lack of flexibility to produce a cut-down >> system. The option of "a dedicated init=/custom-program", but lack of >> an ntpd, for example, because ntp has been absorbed into systemd's >> orbit and other ntpd's bitrotted. > > Unlikely to happen since systemd-timesyncd is not a full NTP daemon. It > lacks ability to act as a server.
And it doesn't appear to regulate the system clock frequency, which basically makes it an inaccurate dumb SNTP client which steps the clock when it synchronises. Roger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/6e8vkb-j33....@silverstone.rilynn.me.uk
