On 2015-01-18 16:06:32 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > I'm going to put together a bit more firm of a proposal in the next few > weeks, but I think that basically everything but nnn-done@ and > nnn-submitter@ should be no different from mailing nnn@, and until I > allow submitters to opt out of e-mail, mailing nnn-submitter@ should be > no different from e-mailing nnn@ either.
It would be great if the maintainer could *always* receive the mail when mailing to nnn@, and not just under obscure conditions. For instance, I've been told by some maintainers that if the bug is reassigned, the maintainer doesn't receive the mail! -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150120160040.gb1...@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr
