Neil Williams, le Wed 06 May 2015 11:39:29 +0100, a écrit : > If the wave simply moves on, leaving the port behind, it is harder to > accept, very hard to regain momentum and high time that the porters > ask themselves the hard question of whether it is worthwhile to > continue, as the crest of the wave rushes off ahead of them.
Just answering this part, I won't bother commenting on the rest. I could be thought that you imply that the hurd-i386 port is in that stage. I want to insist that it steadily improves, it's not on the down slope. There *is* enough manpower to keep up its state, just not enough manpower to make it move as fast as other ports like arm64/ppc64. My concern is whether moving to d-p would slow this down by adding unnecessary workload on the porters. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506105505.ge3...@type.bordeaux.inria.fr
