On 2015-06-15 20:52:25 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > But libgnutls-deb0-28 technically doesn't break libnettle4, nor does > libnettle6. It's only certain combinations of three or more packages > that are broken, something the dependency system can't handle.
Then either the dependency system should be fixed to handle that, or there should be a workaround. > Declaring libnettle6 to break rdeps known to be built against > libnettle4 might be the best option but then again there could be > versions in backports with lower version numbers yet built against > libnettle6. Right? Or libnettle6 could be declared to break libnettle4 to make sure that programs don't link to both at the same time. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150616145826.gc32...@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr
