Nikolaus Rath <[email protected]> writes: > But how is your policy preventing this?
If you're looking for claims of “This policy will absolutely guarantee the malicious behaviour is impossible”, of course that's not a believable claim and I don't expect anyone to seriously propose that. So I don't know what you're fishing for. What *is* claimed, by my reading, is that there is significantly more reason to be confident in an identity that is stable over multiple meetings, in the same social circles, with consequential social bonds and interactions. -- \ “To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you | `\ must also be well-mannered.” —Voltaire | _o__) | Ben Finney
