>>>>> Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> writes:
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:50:46AM +0000, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> Doesn’t the presence of the ‘non-free’ section in the official
>> Debian Release (InRelease) files /already/ mislead inexperienced
>> people into thinking that such software is either part of Debian or
>> endorsed by the project (or both)?
> https://www.debian.org/social_contract point 5.
> We're not exactly unclear about non-free and contrib.
I'd say that those who can discern Debian non-free from Debian
proper are at low risk of confusing, say,  with the "software
[...] endorsed or even produced by Debian."
FSF associate member #7257 58F8 0F47 53F5 2EB2 F6A5 8916 3013 B6A0 230E 334A