>>>>> Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> writes: >>>>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:50:46AM +0000, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> Doesn’t the presence of the ‘non-free’ section in the official >> Debian Release (InRelease) files /already/ mislead inexperienced >> people into thinking that such software is either part of Debian or >> endorsed by the project (or both)? > https://www.debian.org/social_contract point 5. > We're not exactly unclear about non-free and contrib. I'd say that those who can discern Debian non-free from Debian proper are at low risk of confusing, say, [1] with the "software [...] endorsed or even produced by Debian." [1] http://ftp.se.debian.org/mirror/opensolaris.com/ -- FSF associate member #7257 58F8 0F47 53F5 2EB2 F6A5 8916 3013 B6A0 230E 334A
