>>>>> Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> writes:
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:50:46AM +0000, Ivan Shmakov wrote:

 >> Doesn’t the presence of the ‘non-free’ section in the official
 >> Debian Release (InRelease) files /already/ mislead inexperienced
 >> people into thinking that such software is either part of Debian or
 >> endorsed by the project (or both)?

 > https://www.debian.org/social_contract point 5.

 > We're not exactly unclear about non-free and contrib.

        I'd say that those who can discern Debian non-free from Debian
        proper are at low risk of confusing, say, [1] with the "software
        [...] endorsed or even produced by Debian."

[1] http://ftp.se.debian.org/mirror/opensolaris.com/

FSF associate member #7257  58F8 0F47 53F5 2EB2 F6A5  8916 3013 B6A0 230E 334A

Reply via email to