Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Auto reject if autopkgtest of reverse dependencies fail or cause FTBFS"): > In summary: > > * We will introduce it in a non-enforcing mode to see how it works > (and weed out any "early-implementation bugs") > * Passing tests will be grounds for reduced age requirements (once it > has been tested) > * Only regressions will be blockers; if the tests also fail in testing > the migration will not be stalled (but it will be subject to full > age delay)
This would be good. But I do think maintainer control, by way of filing bugs (RC or otherwise) which they explicitly declare to be the cause of individual test failures, would be a good addition. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.