Adam Borowski writes ("Re: If you can't describe what the package is, you probably should not Intend To Package it."): > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > Maybe adding a note stating 'this content is autogenerated and should > > be hand-reviewed', in all of the dh-make-*-enerated packages, would > > help? > > Especially when paired with an autoreject, yes.
Maybe as well as a stick, a carrot or at least some words that might suggest useful things to wrote: [ delete as (in)applicable: This package is part of XXX system / used by XXX / needed as a build-dependency of XXX ] Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.