On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:21:00PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> writes: > > > Specifically take a look at this message from the author of the original > > tool: > > https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/password-store/2017-February/002799.html > > > > The fork appears to have happened after that, but wasn't mentioned at > > all on the upstream mailing list. > > "However, the basic ideas seem like good ones, and I'll look into > adopting these with a less offensive implementation." > > Seems like the author liked the concepts behinds the patches, but felt > that the patches needed more work. I think I would have started by > trying to submit a smaller change (e.g. maybe the first patch in the > series).
The author of `passh`, the forker of `pass` is now also in the To: field. I did add Ivan as an invite to join this discussion. To know why the fork was needed. ( and maybe if it could be avoided ) Previous postings are at http://bugs.debian.org/858229 > > I don't see any response to this email. > > Doesn't inspire confidence :-( The ITP is about six hours old. Allow people some time to response :-) Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven
