On 2017-08-01 23:24:20 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> Therefore, I propose filing ITPs for packages "docbook5", "docbook5-xsl",
> and "docbook5-xml". The packages initially would be based on DocBook 5.1,
> unless DocBook 5.2 is finalized in the meantime.
FYI, docbook5-xml has existed for years, but is not up-to-date
(last updated in 2009).
I've just submitted
against emacs25-common as it contains an obsolete DocBook RNC schema.
IMHO, Emacs should use the schema provided by the docbook*-xml packages.
So, I wonder whether there should be some form of catalog system
for the schemas (/etc/xml/catalog is for the DTD's only). Now that
DocBook 5 has its own namespace, this should be more reliable than
Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)