On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:43:08AM -0700, Michael Lustfield wrote: > I don't think it was answered... Is there an actual reason that this needs > to be handled urgently? Is TLSv1.0/v1.1 considered broken?
Yes. Kurt
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:43:08AM -0700, Michael Lustfield wrote: > I don't think it was answered... Is there an actual reason that this needs > to be handled urgently? Is TLSv1.0/v1.1 considered broken?
Yes. Kurt