On 11/05/2017 10:32 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Hi, > > for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up. > > 20 years ago you could go into a shop and buy a mobile phone > with a CPU supported by the armel port in stretch. > > Roger Shimizu is doing a great job on ARMv5 hardware and I've seen bug > reports from users on ARMv5 hardware in stretch, so it is clear that > ARMv5 should stay supported (and of course also ARMv6 and ARMv7). > That's not clear to me at all. Keeping armel on life support for 2 more years is a significant drain on DSA and our hosters, for questionable benefit.
Cheers, Julien
