Quoting Andreas Schwarz (2018-02-04 13:31:16) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Yes I knew "findmnt", but it takes a different approach. > > lsmount makes it very easy to reduce the information level to the > needed, improves the display with colored columns and alignment > (without forced line breaks) and offers (with -v) a very scripting > friendly output (all configurable on a system-wide and user-level). > > "Findmnt", on the other hand, increases the complexity of usage and > only the representation with the switch -l produces a halfway > parseable output. > Also, df is not useless only because findmnt has a switch that > produces a similar output. "do one thing and do it well" I think df > does this for its case and lsmount will do it as well. > > I wrote lsmount years ago because I didn't find a tool that gives me a > quick and easy to read overview of the "relevant" mountpoints and can > be used in scripts as well. After SSH on a system where I am not > logged in regularly, it is usually the first command I run to get an > overview.
I would use dfc for user-friendly list of mount points, and "lsblk -J" for machine-parsable output of both mounted and unmounted block devices. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private