Philip Hands <p...@hands.com> writes: > Gert Wollny <gw.foss...@gmail.com> writes: > ... >> Short version: Use the salsa per-package issue tracker for problems >> that come up with the review in NEW. > > Is there any significant benefit that this brings over having the same > interaction in the BTS? > > I realise that Gitlab is the new shiny thing, but there is a cost to > using two issue tracking mechanisms when one would do, and for packages > where the maintainer is not actually using salsa, what then?
I would rather like to see the salsa issue page to the BTS (so that "new issue" would create a new BTS entry). Cheers Ole